Showing posts with label Metallica. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Metallica. Show all posts


Daft Punk Is Playing At A Grammy Voter's House! (and many other observations from the 2014 Grammy Awards)


I've become increasingly convinced that the Grammys' sole purpose for existence is to give people something to complain about. I mean, no one's opinion of any musician has ever been altered by finding out that that artist won a Grammy, but if the old fogies who run the joint give an award to the wrong person, we can moan about it till the cows come home. This year, we didn't even need to wait for the show to start.

At around 6:30, it was announced that Macklemore and Ryan Lewis had won Best Rap Album for The Heist, an album that spawned three huge singles, but didn't garner a great deal of critical respect. It had beaten out several far more respected rap albums, including Kanye West's Yeezus, and Kendrick Lamar's good kid m.A.A.d city. This was all the internet needed to lose its collective mind. The combination of giving it to a cheesy rapper over several more credible nominees, and giving it to the lone white rapper in the field, proved deadly, as tweets poured in, some blasting the Grammys, but many more of them blasting Macklemore, accusing him of appropriating black culture (note: you could accuse every white rapper of doing this, I think the aggravating factor with Macklemore is how horribly safe he is). We still had a full hour until the show began, and we'd already had a huge controversy on our hands.

After that, however, the Grammys actually made a lot of correct calls the rest of the night. First off, Daft Punk winning Album of the Year is pretty damn awesome. Not as much of an out-of-nowhere surprise as when Arcade Fire won three years ago, but awesome nonetheless. Plus, there was that brief moment when Taylor Swift thought she had won, then had to awkwardly sit back down. Which was hilarious, even if you like Taylor Swift. We still have to deal with the awkwardness of Record of the Year and Song of the Year being two separate categories, but at least they made solid calls both times, with "Get Lucky" winning the former, while Lorde's "Royals" took the latter. I've heard "Royals" more than enough times in one lifetime, but I'm pretty sure it was good back in October so, yeah, good call.

Ok, let's talk about the performances. Not all of them, because this thing went on for about three days, and I can't possibly think of shit to say about all of them. My favorite performance of the night was the collaboration between Kendrick Lamar and Imagine Dragons, which mashed up "m.A.A.d City," and "Radioactive" (see video below). While I loved Kendrick's album, this performance really solidified his genius to me - he made Imagine Dragons seem downright tolerable! Good even! "Radioactive" was quite possibly my absolute least favorite song of 2013, but when it was Kendrick's backup music, it somehow sounded fucking awesome.

The opening performance of "Drunk In Love" by Beyonce and Jay-Z was pretty damn great too. I'm kind of glad we've all just decided to agree that Beyonce is amazing, and not just parse her lyrics for anything that might be anti-feminist if you deliberately choose to interpret it in an anti-feminist context. I mean, she's been giving us killer jams for 15 years now, and it's high time we stopped finding fault and just embraced her brilliance. Somehow, this performance seemed like a reflection of that, where we could all just appreciate B's awesomeness, and, well, bow down bitches.

Usually, there's at least one train wreck at these awards, but while I'd love to get good and snarky about something, I'm struggling to find a truly terrible performance. There were a few that I had mixed feelings about, however. On one hand, Macklemore is at least trying to do something good with "Same Love," even if you think the song sucks, or that he makes it too much about himself, he at least wants to be on the right side. That said, I thought the onstage marriages were a bit much, because they seemed to reduce the fight for marriage equality to a simple publicity stunt. There are 36 states where same-sex marriage still isn't legal, so it felt like a bit of a premature victory party. On the other hand, Queen Latifah was there, and that alone made it kind of cool...

As for Robin Thicke and Chicago, it was an amusing contrast to the infamous performance with Miley at the VMAs, which gave the indication that Thicke might be trying to clean up his act a little bit. It wasn't anything special, though. I had to suffer through one verse of "Blurred Lines" in exchange for one verse of "Saturday In The Park," then we moved on.

Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr playing together was fun, but it was somewhat underwhelming. The two teamed up to play "Queenie Eye," an admittedly strong track off Paul McCartney's New, but that was it. I mean, you have 50% of The Beatles on stage together, and you don't even do one Beatles song? And somehow, you put this right in the middle of the show, when it would have been an excellent closer. I sure hope somebody got fired for that blunder. 

Some of the better performances were the more understated ones, like Kasey Musgraves' solo acoustic rendition of "Follow Your Arrow," which had the unenviable task of following the Kendrick Lamar/Imagine Dragons performance. The mellow, acoustic performance was a stark contrast to the bombast we had just witnessed, but the song was strong enough that it managed to hold its own anyway. I also enjoyed John Legend's performance of "All Of Me," an underrated ballad which could have more staying power than one might expect.

Metallica doing "One" with Lang Lang was awesome, and did a far better job of mixing Metallica with classical than that S&M album back in 1999 did. Did anyone listen to that more than once? "One Leaf Clover" was good, but other than that, it sucked. I was worried this would be a repeat of that, but instead, it was one of the better performances of the night, and probably turned a few metalheads on to classical music.

Unfortunately, for all the goodwill this show earned, they really fucked up when they cut off Nine Inch Nails and Queens of the Stone Age right in the middle of their show-closing performance. Admittedly, I'm kind of stunned that NIN and QOTSA were even invited to the place, but what the fuck was that about?! The show had already ran 45 minutes too long and now it goes too far?! Sheesh.

Still, most of the performances were good, the bad ones weren't that bad, and an album that normal people actually like won Album of the Year. There were some mistakes - Macklemore winning Best Rap Album was especially boneheaded - but this was much better than most Grammys, and really, I can't ask for a whole lot more than that. Here's to low expectations being slightly exceeded!


John Hugar


$20 Concerts (Other Than Kid Rock) I'd Like To See


About a month ago, Kid Rock made an announcement that made shockwaves throughout the music world. He announced that on his upcoming tour, he’d be charging just $20 per ticket, so that his less wealthy fans could attend the shows.

This was a nice gesture, but what about all the people who aren’t Kid Rock fans? What kind of major acts can they see for just 20 bucks. They might not have a whole lot of options this summer, but I’m here to save the day with a list of popular acts who would do well to charge to just 20 bucks for a show. Most of them are more than rich enough that they can afford it.


U2
Look, it’s easy to make fun of U2. They’re recent albums are a transparent attempt to capture past glories, and Bono is the best example of the White Savior Industrial Complex around. But still, there 80s work, was pretty damn good, and to hear “Sunday Bloody Sunday” and “Bad” performed live in 2013 would be pretty damn awesome. That’s why Bono and company need to get rid of the pretentiousness for a few nights, get back to doing what they doing best, and let fans in on the cheap. It just might remind them of what made them great to begin with.


Foo Fighters
Dave Grohl wants everyone to know that he’s the last bastion of real rock n roll maaaaan! Well, if that’s the case, he shouldn’t care how much dough he rakes in on his next tour with the Foos. They’ve become popular enough that they can charge whatever the hell they want, and people will stay buy tickets, but if Grohl wants to let us know that he still works for the working class music fan, the smartest thing he can do is slash ticket prices severely, so that he average Joe 6-pack, who still plays his well worn copy of The Colour And The Shape can check things out. If the Foos played a series of cheap gigs, it would let the fans know that Grohl truly does care about the little guy and give them a lot of credibility when they claim to rail against the mainstream.


Metallica
Some free advice for James Hetfield and co.: if you want to let the fans you alienated after they downloaded your songs from Napster know you still care about them, give them some cheap gigs that they can actually afford to attend. Metallica is big enough that they can charge whatever they want for tickets, and they’ll still sell, but if they want to prove that they’re still a “real” band, and that fame hasn’t left them separated for the true metalheads, they should give the fans a show that they can actually afford to go to.


Green Day
The rare punk band who lucks out and becomes a mainstream phenomenon, Green Day have made an obscene amount of money over the years, far more than any 3-chord punk band can hope for. Billie Joe Armstrong claims to speak for the working class, but if he wants to prove himself, he ought to put his money where his mouth is and give his actual working-class fans a chance to attend his concert. Who gets to go to Green Day shows now? Upper-middle class kids who may understand what he’s saying in theory, but haven’t actually lived it, and can’t actually relate to the concept of not knowing where you’re next meal is going to come from. how about throwing a bone to the folks who actually have to live that experience day-in, day-out?


The Smiths
I know it’s a long shot, but I’m going to keep bringing it up until it happens. Come on, Morrissey, swallow your pride, and hook with Johnny, Mike, and Andy for a few gigs. And charge a low price for it, so the old school fans can actually make it. If it’ll motivate you, I..um....have a cow in my basement in right now, see. Yeah, see, and if you don’t play few Smiths gigs, I’m gonna force it to listen to Theory of A Deadman, yeah, that’s the ticket.....




John Hugar


Albums In Need Of A Reissue


I still buy CDs. I suspect I'm the minority when it comes to that. It seems like most of my friends fall into one of two groups: people who only get their music from the internet, and the more hardcore fans, who pay the big books for that shiny, 180-gram vinyl. I see the advantage in either of these choices, but I just like CDs. Admittedly, they don't have an immediate cache. They aren't the obvious preferable choice of casual fans or hardcore fans.

So, what keeps the CD from being completely dead? The reissue! There's nothing I enjoy more than hearing that one of my favorite classic albums is being reissued in a glossy two-disc set, with fancy liner notes, and long forgotten live tracks. It just makes my day. When the Beatles were given the remastered treatment in 2009, I was there on the day of release, upgrading my copy of Abbey Road. I was similarly thrilled for the Pink Floyd reissues last year. It's a fun thing for music nerds, and people who still enjoy CDs.

Unfortunately, many legendary albums still go un-remastered, which is a shame. Seeing an immortal album rotting away in a dusty CD case from the late 80s just bums me out. That's why I present you with this list of classic albums that are in dire need of a modern-day upgrade.

Guns 'N Roses - Appetite For Destruction
Every song here is great, from the big hits like "Welcome To the Jungle," and "Paradise City," to deep cuts like "Rocket Queen," and "Nightrain." Once more, the album turned 25 this year. Shouldn't it be celebrating its anniversary in style? Surely there's some old chestnuts of Axl and the boys jamming while stoned off there asses that would make for nice bonus tracks. Come on, people! Let's give this album the deluxe treatment it deserves.

Beastie Boys - License To Ill
As popular as the Beasties' first album is, the group hates it. In a way, that's understandable. It's juvenile, occassionally sexist, and not at all representative of the music or the attitudes they would express in the future. It's also a really, really fun album. Who's never fought for their right to party, or gotten funky with a certain monkey? Sure, this might not be the quintessential Beastie Boys album, and it lacks the diversity of their later works, but it's a much-beloved album, and an important part of hip-hop history.


All Of Metallica's First Five Albums
While their later works have been inconsistent, pretty much anything Metallica put out between 1983 to 1991 is gold. From the sped-up head rush of Kill 'Em All to the intricate math-metal of ...And Just For All, these guys were pretty much infallible in their early years. That's why it sucks to see the same copies of these albums that were on shelevs in 1992 still there today. Come on, let's get some outtakes! Surely you have some late-night jam sessions with Dave Mustaine that he'll eventually sue over. Let the fans get in on some of that!
Tom Petty - Full Moon Fever
Petty's works have been horribly ignored by the remaster gods, with only Damn the Torpedoes getting the deluxe treatment in 2010. The rest of his albums rot on the shelves, with some of the his most popular albums dying a slow death in the discount bin. Surely the album that gave us "Free Fallin'," "I Won't Back Down," and "Runnin' Down A Dream" deserves better than that. I'm guessing Petty has plenty of stuff in the vaults; jams with the Wilbury's, live recordings with Dylan, maybe even a few Apple jams with George Harrison. Whatever he's got lying around, I'm sure it would make for an excellent bonus disc of this classic album.


The First Three Stone Temple Pilots Albums
Loathed by critics at first, people have finally discovered that STP are actually pretty damn good. the first three album rank among the best (and most overlooked) albums of their era. Tracks like "Interstate Love Song," "Sex Type Thing," and "Trippin On A Hole In A Paper Heart" have become well-deserved classics. Unfortunately, the most likely place to find the albums those tracks come from is in the used bin at record stores, gasping for air next to Deep Blue Something and Sister Hazel. Let's treat STP better than that! their debut, Core, celebrates its 20th anniversary this year. Let's give it the gift of a shiny new remaster.


Anything By The Dave Clark 5
Now this one is a real tragedy. The DC5 were a great British Invasion band, but they've been all but forgotten. More importantly, their albums don't exist on CD. I did see one old greatest hits in the used bin at FYE, but it was $60, because of how hard it is to find. Surely the band that gave us "Glad All Over," "Bits And Pieces," and "Catch Us If You Can" deserves to be discovered by new listeners. In an ideal world, we'd get a fresh new greatest hits on CD, and high quality vinyl reissues for the hardcore fans. The DC5 released tons of killer songs, but there's a whole generation who hasn't heard any of them. Let's try to fix that.


John Hugar