Showing posts with label r.e.m.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label r.e.m.. Show all posts


The U2 Deathwatch


I listen to a lot of music, and have listened to a lot of music and been to a lot of shows, but the band that's been "it" for me going back to before high school has been U2. I've had my ups and downs with the band, and I've loved some albums and tours more than others, but they've been the soundtrack to my life, high school, college and adulthood, and a true inspiration. Their early apolitical activism; their 90's dalliances with art, literature, and culture jamming; and the fact that they've used their status as "the world's biggest band" to mean something, for me it's generally been real easy buying into what U2 was up to. But not always, and nothing lasts forever, which is why reading the tea leaves about U2's future has been both fascinating and a wee bit difficult.

For me personally, the warning signs started with 2005's How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb, which not only featured an unwieldly title but worse, subtle reworkings of vintage and tried but true U2 sounds for new consumption. The accompanying tour also felt like a retread of their highly successful 2001 arena tour that culminated in their blockbuster set during Super Bowl XXXVI. That 2001 U2 show at the HSBC Arena was sensational and an intense communal experience that had the whole place jumping; the show in 2005 however felt a bit hollow... even though they played lots of material off of Achtung Baby, my favorite U2 album. At the time I forgave them because it was the end of a long and stressful tour, but I felt the same ambivalence watching the obligatory live dvd, and it worried me.

Then U2 delivered No Line On The Horizon (unwieldly album title alert) in 2009 to a pretty big thud, which was the result of the band's ill considered desire to pursue Middle Eastern fusion prog rock (with a few strained sounding "hits" interspersed for fan service), but it was the title track that bummed me out the most because it was a blatant rip off of the old U2 b-side "Lady With The Spinning Head," which was itself a dry run for classic Achtung Baby album tracks "The Fly" and "Zoo Station." It was bad enough that U2 thought they could slip that by their die hard fans, who would remember the song from the infamous and widely circulated stolen tape bootlegs of the recording sessions from Berlin, the single it was originally featured on ("One," with the brilliant David Wojnarowicz cover), or 2002's The Best Of 1990-2000 & B-Sides compilation. The real rub however was the stark realization that at the end of the first decade of the 21st Century, U2 was out of ideas.

Funny and telling story: The U2 "360" show at the Rogers Centre really felt like some of that old magic was back after the No Line On The Horizon dud. The band gave it their all, and with Bono preachifying at every opportunity (never a line wasted with that guy- the result of hanging out with too many politicians), it felt right, with the communal experience restored. Of course upon further review I concluded that was in large part due to the ridiculous and brilliant stage design- you remember the vaguely Dalekesque space claw (the band even went onstage to Bowie's "Space Oddity") featured in the the accompanying video clip that actively incorporated the crowd into the band's visual/spatial tableau enjoyed by said crowd. Credit is due where credit is due, it was an inspired decision that worked artistically and commercially from a ticket selling perspective, but at the time I was all warm and fuzzy, and like many of the faithful I wanted to soak the experience up until the very end. But after a few post show songs on the PA the staff ushered us out, and no sooner had we cleared a point in the tunnel near some Portapotties, an "all clear!" was given into a walkie talkie, and a stream of big rig trucks started ripping 30 mph into the backstage area, one after another in a frankly surreal display that amazed the exiting die hards. Time is money, the space ship was due in another city, and U2's organization clearly didn't mess around. 

U2's organization has a problem though, and that's the seeming fact that the band has run out of creative gas. There is a precedence for this: fellow 80's stalwarts R.E.M. soldiered on after the departure of Bill Berry in 1997 to mixed success until their inertia ground to a total halt on 2004's torpid Around The Sun. That said, by the time they were recycling their original pre Chronic Town punk sound on Accelerate, R.E.M. knew it was over, and after tidying up their affairs with the largely unremarkable Collapse Into Now in 2011, they honorably called it quits on their own terms... and proceeded to seemingly fall off the face of the Earth. 

U2's organization also just went through a seismic shakeup (chronicled by Toronto DJ, music writer and U2 watcher Alan Cross) the saw the retirement of their long time manager (and unofficial/official fifth*) member Paul McGuinness, with Guy Oseary (Madonna's manager) taking over day to day U2 operations. It's easy to forget that while U2 got started as teenagers, it was grown ups who tended the flame, and now after 30 years, many of those vital parts of the U2 family have moved on, with the organization merging into another organization built around another long in the tooth pop star. Paul McGuinness was U2's chief grown up and the only manager they've ever known, and among U2 watchers, there's a real question as to how long they'll continue without him steering the U2 ship of state.

Which brings us to right now. The band snagged a Golden Globe for the nice yet unremarkable song for the recent Nelson Mandela biopic with Idris Elba. Cross linked to an uncredited ditty that's allegedly an outtake from U2's upcoming album, a ditty that sounds suspiciously like vintage U2 (I mean come on, that's clearly Dave Evans playing that classic, vintage Edge guitar), and U2 is set to unveil the first single from the Danger Mouse produced album set to land later in the spring during the Super Bowl thanks to a possibly unholy alliance with Bank Of America ("the most hated bank in America"). 

With the gears of the U2 machine turning again, and on the biggest platform, will it be for their last hurrah, with the big valedictory album roll out and subsequent swan song global mega tour? Will anybody beyond their legion of fans, and the fans studying the signs, even care? Hell, R.E.M. didn't give us fans a farewell tour. I hope U2 does, but I'll cross that bridge when I have to. Maybe U2 will catch their fourth wind, and emerge creatively recharged, relevant, and cool with Madonna's manager coordinating the show. I'd be cool with that; they've been the soundtrack to my life and I'm not against them keeping on keeping on so I can grow old with them like Stones fans have with Mick and Keith. If not, well, I might be OK with that too, if it's time. Might be.


* Unofficial because obviously he wasn't part of the band. Officially because they split U2's take 5 ways. Or at least they used to.





Cliff Parks




What Makes A Band?


Last week, Stone Temple Pilots announced that Scott Weiland was fired from the band. He responded in a statement that he was confused by how he could be fired from a band in which he co-wrote many songs, fronted, and co-founded. He later then tried saying that the incident was part of a publicity stunt. In fact, Scott Weiland just last night played Core and Purple in their entirety at the Rapids Theater, so would Stone Temple Pilots still be Stone Temple Pilots without him? What if they got a new lead singer and continued with the STP name and played their songs? What if Scott Weiland continued playing STP music with a different band at the same time? Could two STP exists and would both parties have a legitimate claim? All of this got me wondering about what a band’s identity is. Is it the name or is it the people who are in it that make a band? Are certain band members more important to a bands identity than others?


Take R.E.M for example.  This band is a consistent group of people. Throughout their entire run, the same four people were a part of this band. When their drummer, Bill Berry, quit, R.E.M didn’t end, but they didn’t replace him either. Instead, they continued on as a trio. For R.E.M, they wouldn’t be R.E.M if a band member changed.


Some bands don’t have such a unity amongst members. In fact, the band seems more to like a backing band for a lead vocalist. The Foo Fighters are this type of this band. They should really be called Dave Grohl and the Foo Fighters because besides their bassist, Nate Mendel, he is the only consistent band member and if he was gone, the rest of the band would be done. Foo Fighters has seen several drummers and guitarists come and go over their span but throughout, the same identity of Foo Fighters remained.


When the members of Rage Against the Machine, without their lead singer, teamed up with Chris Cornell as lead vocalist, they didn’t keep the Rage Against the Machine name, but rather became Audioslave. The three Rage Against the Machine members switched one member and changed their name while Foo Fighters switched several and kept going. The lead singer seems to be the key to a bands identity.


There is a famous anecdote involving the Rolling Stones about band member importance. As it goes, Mick Jagger called Charlie Watts and asked where his drummer was. In response, Watts punched Jagger. Fun story but let’s be real here. If Watts left the Stones, no one would notice at the next concert. But if an arena full of people showed up for a Rolling Stones concert and Jagger wasn’t there, people would want a refund.


That is part of a long standing stereotype that drummers are replaceable and so they don’t get much respect within the band. But could Rush be Rush without Neil Peart? This band is an example where if you took away any one of the band members, that band would probably cease to exist. But they too had a different drummer before Peart. That however was before they became famous. The integral members of a band then, who make up their identity, must be around when the band becomes famous. Is anyone going to argue that Pete Best was a Beatle?


Another common denominator in these bands is the lead singer and guitarist who exist at a bands high point. It is those two components that give a band its identity and without both of them the band does not exist. This can be seen in bands like \the Who and Led Zeppelin. Both of those bands continue without their original drummers but still have the lead singer and guitarist and so have kept the name.


But then there are two bands that are exceptions to this. One would think that it would be impossible to have Guns N’ Roses without Slash but they still exist and even released an album without him. Journey’s only consistent member throughout their history has been the lead guitarist though. Their vocalist, the one there for the biggest years of the band is no longer a part of the group and has been replaced.


There is no consistent pattern to what makes a band a band so it’ll be interesting to see what happens with Stone Temple Pilots. 


 Matthew Lenox


It's The End of The World As We Know It, And Cliff Could Care Less


Well, 12 hours from now, at 4:12 Mountain Standard Time tomorrow, December 21, 2012 the clock strikes APOCALYPSE according to the Internet, so to get ready for impending doom here's a handy End of the World playlist to get you in the right frame of mind.


Enjoy, and see you on the other side.


Tame Impala -  "Apocalypse Dreams."





Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds - "(I"ll Love You) Until The End Of The World."




U2 - "Until The End Of The World"





R.E.M. - "It's The End Of The World As We Know It (And I Feel Fine)."





David Byrne - "Nothing But Flowers."




Please note: I think it's all bunk, as apparently the Mayans themselves are asking themselves "what's up with these gringo's?" but hey, it's all good fun. Sure I myself am keen on Evo Morales' very Alan Moore-esque theory that "according to the Mayan calendar, the 21 of December is the end of the non-time and the beginning of time.It is the end of hatred and the beginning of love, the end of lies and beginning of truth." Yes, that would definitely be cool, especially after this last week... but I ain't holding my breath.



Cliff Parks


R.E.M. Announce Break Up



Today is a really sad day for fans of indie and alternative rock. R.E.M. announced via their website last night that they would be breaking up.  This statement was posted by the band: "To our Fans and Friends: As R.E.M., and as lifelong friends and co-conspirators, we have decided to call it a day as a band.  We walk away with a great sense of gratitude, of finality, and of astonishment at all we have accomplished.  To anyone who ever felt touched by our music, our deepest thanks for listening."  The band also released individual statements about the break-up on their website. For those old enough to remember, R.E.M. shook the airwaves in the late-eighties as perhaps the first "college" or "alternative" band to recieve radio play and love from MTV.  They ushered in a new generation of fans who had grown tired of hair metal, and ballad pop, exposing the masses to a new sound as well as ushering in a new wave of artists like the Replacements and Husker Du.  While they were inevitably lumped into the "grunge" scene, R.E.M. was so much more than that; an eclectic band that stood out all on their own.  You know your something special if Thom Yorke and Kurt Cobain worship your band.  I'll always remember the video for "Everybody Hurts", and how crushingly moving the song and that video were.  I was hooked thereafter.  I suggest that everybody listen to a few songs by R.E.M today in tribute to one of the best bands of the last twenty years.


R.E.M. "Oh My Heart" by Warner Music Group DE


jon krol